If you have been reading about HPLC and want a single page that covers the useful parts, this is it: definitions, context, how it is studied, and the questions that come up repeatedly.
Last reviewed on 2025-10-25. Where a claim depends on a specific study, the study is described rather than over-claimed.
System suitability testing is performed before and during analytical runs to confirm that the instrument and method are working as expected. Common checks include retention time, peak area, resolution between critical pairs, tailing factor, and theoretical plate count. Results are compared with predefined limits, and a failed check requires investigation before sample results are reported. Quality control samples at low, middle, and high concentrations are injected at intervals to monitor accuracy and precision. Blank injections detect carryover and contamination, while control charts track performance over time.
Data handling and documentation are central to HPLC quality control. Electronic systems should have audit trails that record changes to methods, sequences, and results. Integration parameters, such as peak baseline and threshold, can affect reported areas and must be defined in advance. Out-of-specification results trigger a structured investigation that may include reanalysis, instrument checks, and review of sample preparation. Regulatory inspections often examine raw data, audit trails, and training records to verify that reported results are traceable and reliable.
Method validation establishes that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended use. Key parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, and robustness. Accuracy measures agreement with a true or accepted value, while precision describes repeatability and intermediate precision. Specificity confirms that the method measures the analyte without interference from impurities, degradants, or excipients. Validation is documented in a protocol and report, and acceptance criteria are set before experiments begin. Regulatory guidance varies by region, but the general principles are widely harmonized.
Method validation establishes that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness, and solution stability. Accuracy reflects closeness to a reference value, while precision reflects agreement among repeated measurements. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte without interference from matrix components. Validation is documented through protocols and reports, and the required extent depends on the method's use and regulatory context.
Routine quality control uses system suitability, blank injections, check standards, and control samples to detect drift or contamination. System suitability criteria may specify minimum resolution, maximum tailing factor, and a permitted range for repeated injections. Blank injections reveal carryover or solvent contamination, while check standards confirm calibration accuracy over a batch. Control samples with known analyte levels can show whether results remain within statistical limits. When a control result falls outside limits, the analyst investigates the cause and may invalidate affected results before repeating the batch.
Documentation and traceability are central to regulated HPLC testing. Records typically include instrument logs, column history, mobile-phase preparation, sample preparation, injection sequences, raw chromatograms, and audit trails. Electronic systems may require user access controls, time-stamped changes, and backup procedures. Training records show that analysts are qualified for assigned methods. Audits and inspections check whether written procedures match actual practice and whether deviations are documented. These controls support reproducibility and allow results to be reconstructed if questions arise later.
| Property | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Validation parameter | Accuracy | Measured value compared with true or accepted value |
| Precision type | Repeatability | Same analyst, instrument, and short time interval |
| Linearity range | 50–150% of target concentration | Common for assay methods; method-dependent |
| Limit of quantitation | Signal-to-noise ratio of 10:1 | Lowest concentration with acceptable precision |
| Common synonyms | Method validation, analytical validation | Documented confirmation that a method is suitable |
High-performance liquid chromatography, or HPLC, separates dissolved compounds by passing a liquid mobile phase through a packed column. Components distribute differently between the stationary phase and the moving liquid, so they travel at different speeds and exit at different times. A detector records these eluting bands as peaks, and peak area or height relates to amount. The technique supports testing in pharmaceuticals, foods, environmental samples, and industrial chemicals. Quantification usually depends on calibration with known standards.
Several separation modes exist, including reversed-phase, normal-phase, ion-exchange, size-exclusion, and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. Reversed-phase uses a nonpolar stationary phase with a polar mobile phase and is widely applied to small organic molecules. Gradient elution changes mobile phase composition during the run, while isocratic elution keeps it constant. Column chemistry, particle size, temperature, flow rate, and mobile phase pH all influence retention and resolution. Method development selects conditions that separate analytes from matrix components and from each other.
Detection commonly uses ultraviolet-visible absorbance, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometry. Ultraviolet detection depends on molecular chromophores that absorb light at specific wavelengths. Mass spectrometry provides mass information and sensitive quantification, often after electrospray ionization. Before sample batches, performance checks examine resolution, elution time repeatability, peak symmetry, and plate count. Matrix effects and co-elution remain recognized uncertainties; formal validation studies and orthogonal detection help address them. Detector choice depends on analyte properties and required sensitivity.
Developing an HPLC test begins with defining the analytes, matrix, and required reporting limits. Chemists select a separation mode, column chemistry, mobile phase composition, flow rate, and detection wavelength or mass transition. Experiments then adjust these variables to achieve adequate retention, resolution, and peak shape. System suitability tests confirm that the instrument and method perform consistently before sample analysis. Without suitable resolution, quantitative results may be unreliable. Preliminary runs often use scouting gradients to locate retention windows.
Validation establishes that a method is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantification, robustness, and stability of standards and samples. Acceptance criteria are defined in advance, and results are documented in a validation report. Regulatory guidance for pharmaceuticals, foods, and environmental testing differs, so the applicable framework must be identified. Ongoing verification uses control samples and trend charts after validation. Method transfer to another laboratory may require partial revalidation.
Most routine HPLC testing uses reversed-phase columns, where the stationary phase is nonpolar and the mobile phase is a polar mixture such as water with an organic solvent. Analytes partition between the two phases according to polarity, size, and charge. Gradients that change solvent composition over time can separate compounds with broad retention ranges. Isocratic conditions keep solvent composition constant and suit simpler mixtures. The choice of column chemistry, pH, and temperature affects selectivity and peak shape.
Detection in HPLC testing commonly relies on ultraviolet-visible absorbance, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometry. UV detection is widely used because many organic compounds absorb light, but it requires a chromophore. Mass spectrometry provides mass-based identification and high sensitivity for trace analytes. Each detector has trade-offs in selectivity, cost, and compatibility with mobile phases. Quantification typically uses calibration curves prepared from reference standards. Results are reported as concentration, purity, or presence above a limit.
Volanesorsen was approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of familial chylomicronaemia syndrome in May 2019. In January 2013 mipomersen (marketed as Kynamro) was approved by the FDA for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Inotersen received FDA approval for the treatment of hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis in October 2018. The application for inotersen was granted orphan drug designation. It was developed by Ionis Pharmaceuticals and licensed to Akcea Therapeutics. Patisiran (sold under Onpattro) was developed by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, and also approved for use in the US and EU in 2018 with orphan drug designation. Its mechanism-of-action is the active substance of small interfering RNA (siRNA), which allows it to interfere with and block the production of transthyretin. As such, it was the first FDA-approved siRNA therapeutic.
Libraries of peptide aptamers have been used as "mutagens", in studies in which an investigator introduces a library that expresses different peptide aptamers into a cell population, selects for a desired phenotype, and identifies those aptamers that cause the phenotype. The investigator then uses those aptamers as baits, for example in yeast two-hybrid screens to identify the cellular proteins targeted by those aptamers. Such experiments identify particular proteins bound by the aptamers, and protein interactions that the aptamers disrupt, to cause the phenotype. In addition, peptide aptamers derivatized with appropriate functional moieties can cause specific post-translational modification of their target proteins, or change the subcellular localization of the targets.
Waters joined UNC-Chapel Hill as an assistant professor in 1999. As of 2018, she is the Glen H. Elder, Jr. Distinguished Professor. Waters' research began with studies of non-covalent interactions in peptide beta-hairpin model systems, specifically, how pi-pi and cation-pi system interactions could influence peptide folding and function. This research can also extend to molecular recognition, in which specific peptide cavities can be designed to "host" selected organic molecules. Waters' group also studies protein and peptide methylation patterns and their biophysical interactions, which can relate to epigenetic disease mechanisms. She collaborated with faculty colleague Nancy Albritton to study degrons of proteolytically cleaved ubiquitins.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
The 1-deoxysphingolipids (1-deoxySLs) are a recently identified class of atypical sphingolipids (SLs). They are produced via a non-canonical biosynthetic pathway, and their defining feature, the absence of a C1 hydroxyl group (C1-OH), prevents their further conversion into complex sphingolipids. Under normal conditions, sphingolipids are synthesized through a reaction catalyzed by the enzyme serine-palmitoyltransferase (SPT), which condenses serine with palmitoyl-CoA. However, when SPT utilizes alternative amino acid substrates such as alanine or glycine instead of serine, it leads to the formation of 1-deoxySLs. Unlike canonical sphingolipids, 1-deoxysphingolipids cannot be degraded via standard catabolic pathways. As a result, they accumulate to high levels and have been implicated in a range of neurological and metabolic disorders. There are two types of 1-deoxySLs: 1-deoxysphinganine and 1-deoxymethylsphinganine.
62. Tirzepatide. Farzam K(1), Patel P. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan–. 2026 Sep 14. Author information: (1)McMaster University Tirzepatide is a medication approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea. As a dual agonist of the glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptors, it improves glycemic control and reduces body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes. Administered once weekly via subcutaneous injection with incremental dose adjustments, tirzepatide is used as a second-line diabetes medication. Tirzepatide is not approved for the treatment of type 1 diabetes and has not been adequately studied in patients with pancreatitis. Common adverse effects are gastrointestinal, including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. This activity provides an overview of the indications, mechanism of action, administration, adverse effects, contraindications, drug interactions, and considerations for specific patient populations. The activity also enhances clinicians’ competence in administering tirzepatide, monitoring treatment response and adverse effects, and managing patients with type 2 diabetes to improve patient outcomes and safety. Copyright © 2026, StatPearls Publishing LLC.
2-, alpha-, or α-amino acids have the generic formula H2NCHRCOOH in most cases, where R is an organic substituent known as a "side chain". Of the many hundreds of described amino acids, 22 are proteinogenic ("protein-building"). It is these 22 compounds that combine to give a vast array of peptides and proteins assembled by ribosomes. Non-proteinogenic amino acids may arise through nonribosomal peptide synthesis. Modified amino acids, by contrast, typically result from post-translational modification. Amino acids with the structure NH+3−CXY−CXY−CO−2, such as β-alanine, a component of carnosine and a few other peptides, are β-amino acids. Ones with the structure NH+3−CXY−CXY−CXY−CO−2 are γ-amino acids, and so on, where X and Y are two substituents (one of which is normally H).
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Akt resides in the cytosol in an inactive conformation, until the cell is stimulated and it translocates to the plasma membrane. The Akt PH domain has a high affinity for second messenger PI(3,4,5)P3, binding to it preferentially over other phosphoinositides. Thus PI3K activity is essential for translocation of Akt to the membrane. Interaction with PI(3,4,5)P3 causes conformational changes and exposure of phosphorylation sites Thr308 in the kinase domain and Ser473 in the C-terminal domain. Akt is partially activated by phosphorylation of T308 by PDK1. Full activation requires phosphorylation of S473, which can be catalysed by multiple proteins, including phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 2 (PDK2), integrin-linked kinase (ILK), mechanistic target of rapamycin complex complex 2 (mTORC2) and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). The regulation of Ser473 phosphorylation is not fully understood but may also be influenced by autophosphorylation after Thr308 phosphorylation. After stimulation, the levels of PIP3 decrease and Akt activity is attenuated by dephosphorylation by serine/threonine phosphatases.
At the regulatory site, the binding of a ligand may elicit amplified or inhibited protein function. The binding of a ligand to an allosteric site of a multimeric enzyme often induces positive cooperativity, that is the binding of one substrate induces a favorable conformation change and increases the enzyme's likelihood to bind to a second substrate. Regulatory site ligands can involve homotropic and heterotropic ligands, in which single or multiple types of molecule affects enzyme activity respectively. Enzymes that are highly regulated are often essential in metabolic pathways. For example, phosphofructokinase (PFK), which phosphorylates fructose in glycolysis, is largely regulated by ATP. Its regulation in glycolysis is imperative because it is the committing and rate limiting step of the pathway. PFK also controls the amount of glucose designated to form ATP through the catabolic pathway. Therefore, at sufficient levels of ATP, PFK is allosterically inhibited by ATP. This regulation efficiently conserves glucose reserves, which may be needed for other pathways. Citrate, an intermediate of the citric acid cycle, also works as an allosteric regulator of PFK.
CDs and DVDs have a protective film which must be stripped to reveal the gold reflective film or polycarbonate (PC) base. The surface of the disk can be activated to reveal the metal layer which allows compounds to bind to it. Compounds such as UV/ozone or an oxygen plasma treatment can be used to activate the disk to produce a hydrophilic surface with densely packed carboxylic acid groups. As one-off microassay can be printed onto the activated disks using a noncontact printer to dispel nanoliter quantities of coating conjugates onto the disk. Proteins or antibodies acting as probe molecules can then covalently bind to the disk surface and can be incubated. A polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) channel plate can also be used to immobilize the probes in a line array. The plate is removed, and the process is repeated with another plate to deliver analyte samples in a line array perpendicular to the probe array. The probe and analyte samples can bind or hybridize at the intersections of the arrays to create rectangular hybridization sites. The disk is washed, rinsed, and dried prior to reading. This process can be done manually or automated; in theory discs with pre-made assays could be manufactured and sold en masse.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
System suitability is a set of checks that confirm the instrument and method perform within limits before sample analysis. It typically includes resolution, tailing factor, retention time, and peak area reproducibility. If a check fails, the run is invalidated until the cause is resolved.
QC samples are usually injected at the beginning, at intervals during the run, and at the end. The exact frequency depends on the method, sample count, and regulatory requirements. Results outside acceptance limits can require rejection of the affected samples and investigation.
Method validation demonstrates that an HPLC procedure produces reliable results for its intended purpose. It provides documented evidence for accuracy, precision, specificity, and other performance characteristics. Regulators and quality systems require validation before a method is used for release or stability testing.
Validation establishes suitability for a new method, while verification confirms that a method works in a specific laboratory. Verification is often used when a validated method is adopted with existing equipment and staff. Both rely on documented acceptance criteria.