retention time comes up often in conversation and rarely with the context attached. Here we lay out the basics in order, then work through the practical considerations.
Last reviewed on 2025-10-09. Where a claim depends on a specific study, the study is described rather than over-claimed.
Method validation examines whether an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Common parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, detection limit, quantification limit, and robustness. Accuracy describes closeness to a true or accepted value, while precision describes agreement among repeated measurements. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte without interference from related substances. Robustness tests small deliberate changes in flow, temperature, or solvent composition. Validation is not a one-time event; methods may need partial revalidation after changes to instruments, columns, sample handling, or specification limits. Regulatory guidance provides frameworks, but some details remain method-specific.
Regulatory and pharmacopeial texts shape how HPLC testing is performed and documented. The International Council for Harmonisation provides validation guidance, while pharmacopeias publish general chromatography chapters and monographs for specific materials. Accreditation standards such as ISO/IEC 17025 address laboratory competence and traceability. Inspectors may review instrument qualification, analyst training, reference material control, and electronic records. Open questions include how best to validate methods for new complex products and how to handle automated data processing. Laboratories generally resolve these issues through risk assessment, method lifecycle management, and documented scientific justification.
Detection commonly uses ultraviolet-visible absorbance, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometry. Ultraviolet detection depends on molecular chromophores that absorb light at specific wavelengths. Mass spectrometry provides mass information and sensitive quantification, often after electrospray ionization. Before sample batches, performance checks examine resolution, elution time repeatability, peak symmetry, and plate count. Matrix effects and co-elution remain recognized uncertainties; formal validation studies and orthogonal detection help address them. Detector choice depends on analyte properties and required sensitivity.
High-performance liquid chromatography, or HPLC, separates dissolved compounds by passing a liquid mobile phase through a packed column. Components distribute differently between the stationary phase and the moving liquid, so they travel at different speeds and exit at different times. A detector records these eluting bands as peaks, and peak area or height relates to amount. The technique supports testing in pharmaceuticals, foods, environmental samples, and industrial chemicals. Quantification usually depends on calibration with known standards.
Several separation modes exist, including reversed-phase, normal-phase, ion-exchange, size-exclusion, and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. Reversed-phase uses a nonpolar stationary phase with a polar mobile phase and is widely applied to small organic molecules. Gradient elution changes mobile phase composition during the run, while isocratic elution keeps it constant. Column chemistry, particle size, temperature, flow rate, and mobile phase pH all influence retention and resolution. Method development selects conditions that separate analytes from matrix components and from each other.
| Property | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Primary guidance | ICH Q2(R2) | Analytical procedure validation |
| Compendial chapter | USP <621> | Chromatography general chapter |
| Validation parameter | Accuracy | Closeness to accepted true value |
| System suitability check | Peak resolution | Ensures separation between adjacent peaks |
| Data record | Audit trail | Supports data integrity and traceability |
Routine HPLC testing compares a sample result with a calibration curve prepared from known reference standards. Peak area or peak height is plotted against concentration, and the curve is used to estimate unknown amounts. Retention time supports tentative identification when compared with a standard, though mass spectrometry or another confirmatory method may be needed for definitive identification. Pre-run checks verify repeatability, resolution, and peak symmetry before sample analysis. Limits of detection and quantification describe the smallest amounts that can be reliably observed or measured. Sample preparation, filtration, and degassing help prevent column damage and inconsistent results.
High-performance liquid chromatography is an analytical technique that separates components in a liquid sample. A pump moves a liquid mobile phase through a column packed with a solid stationary phase. Compounds interact differently with both phases and travel at different rates, leaving the column at distinct retention times. A detector records these arrivals as peaks on a chromatogram. The resulting pattern supports identification and quantification of substances in mixtures. Modern instruments use high pressure to force solvent through small particles, which improves speed and resolution compared with older low-pressure liquid chromatography methods.
System suitability testing is performed before and during analytical runs to confirm that the instrument and method are working as expected. Typical checks include retention time, peak area precision, resolution between critical pairs, tailing factor, and theoretical plate count. Acceptance criteria are set in the method or pharmacopeial monograph. If a suitability check fails, the run may be rejected and the instrument or sample preparation may need investigation. This practice helps prevent release of data from a system that has drifted out of control.
Quality control samples are inserted at intervals to monitor accuracy and precision throughout a batch. Blank samples detect contamination, while spiked samples assess recovery from the sample matrix. Calibration standards establish the relationship between detector response and concentration, and control samples are prepared independently from them whenever possible. Laboratories also participate in proficiency testing and maintain audit trails, instrument logs, and reagent records. Ongoing review of control charts can reveal trends before they cause out-of-specification results.
Method validation demonstrates that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Common validation parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and robustness. Accuracy reflects agreement with a reference value, while precision describes repeatability under defined conditions. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte in the presence of impurities or matrix components. Validation documents are reviewed before a method is used for routine testing or regulatory submissions.
=== Estimates of numbers === Frequency and number estimates of de novo genes in various lineages vary widely and are highly dependent on methodology. Studies may identify de novo genes by phylostratigraphy/BLAST-based methods alone, or may employ a combination of computational techniques, and may or may not assess experimental evidence for expression and/or biological role. Furthermore, genome-scale analyses may consider all or most ORFs in the genome, or may instead limit their analysis to previously annotated genes. The D. melanogaster lineage is illustrative of these differing approaches. An early survey using a combination of BLAST searches performed on cDNA sequences along with manual searches and synteny information identified 72 new genes specific to D. melanogaster and 59 new genes specific to three of the four species in the D. melanogaster species complex. This report found that only 2/72 (~2.8%) of D. melanogaster-specific new genes and 7/59 (~11.9%) of new genes specific to the species complex were derived de novo, with the remainder arising via duplication/retroposition. Similarly, an analysis of 195 young (<35 million years old) D. melanogaster genes identified from syntenic alignments found that only 16 had arisen de novo. In contrast, an analysis focused on transcriptomic data from the testes of six D. melanogaster strains identified 106 fixed and 142 segregating de novo genes. For many of these, ancestral ORFs were identified but were not expressed.
The New Union Treaty (Russian: Новый союзный договор, romanized: Novyy soyuznyy dogovor) was a 1990 draft treaty that would have replaced the 1922 Treaty on the Creation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) to salvage and reform the USSR. The preparation of this treaty was known as the Novo-Ogaryovo process, named after Novo-Ogaryovo, a governmental estate where the work on the document was carried out and where Soviet President and CPSU General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev talked with leaders of Union republics. A ceremony of the Russian SFSR signing the treaty was scheduled for 20 August 1991, but was prevented by the August Coup. In its aftermath, the Soviet Union ultimately dissolved by December of the same year, and the Commonwealth of Independent States was set up in its place.
== Motivation == FTIR is a method of measuring infrared absorption and emission spectra. For a discussion of why people measure infrared absorption and emission spectra, i.e. why and how substances absorb and emit infrared light, see the article: Infrared spectroscopy.
A chromogranin A-derived antifungal peptide (CGA 47–66, chromofungin) when embedded on a surface has been shown to have antifungal activity by interacting with the fungal membrane and thereby penetrating the cell. Additionally, in vitro studies have demonstrated that such an antifungal coating can inhibit the growth of yeast Candida albicans by 65% and completely stop the proliferation of filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Copper and copper alloy surfaces have demonstrated a die-off of Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp., Penicillium chrysogenum, Aspergillus niger and Candida albicans fungal spores. Hence, the potential to help prevent the spread of fungi that cause human infections by using copper alloys (instead of non-antifungal metals) in air conditioning systems is worthy of further investigation. The physical topology of a surface will determine the viable environment for bacteria. It may affect a microbe's ability to adhere to its surface. Textile surfaces tend to be very easy for microbes to adhere to due to the abundance of interstitial spacing between fibers.
Little prolactin—the predominant form. It has a molecular weight of approximately 23-kDa. It is a single-chain polypeptide of 199 amino acids and is apparently the result of removal of some amino acids. Big prolactin—approximately 48 kDa. It may be the product of interaction of several prolactin molecules. It appears to have little, if any, biological activity. Macroprolactin—approximately 150 kDa. It appears to have a low biological activity. Other variants with the molecular masses of 14, 16, and 22 kDa. The levels of larger ones are somewhat higher during the early postpartum period.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
=== Chemical === Bohrium is the fifth member of the 6d series of transition metals and the heaviest member of group 7 in the periodic table, below manganese, technetium and rhenium. All the members of the group readily portray their group oxidation state of +7 and the state becomes more stable as the group is descended. Thus bohrium is expected to form a stable +7 state. Technetium also shows a stable +4 state whilst rhenium exhibits stable +4 and +3 states. Bohrium may therefore show these lower states as well. The higher +7 oxidation state is more likely to exist in oxyanions, such as perbohrate, BhO−4, analogous to the lighter permanganate, pertechnetate, and perrhenate. Nevertheless, bohrium(VII) is likely to be unstable in aqueous solution, and would probably be easily reduced to the more stable bohrium(IV). The lighter group 7 elements are known to form volatile heptoxides M2O7 (M = Mn, Tc, Re), so bohrium should also form the volatile oxide Bh2O7. The oxide should dissolve in water to form perbohric acid, HBhO4. Rhenium and technetium form a range of oxyhalides from the halogenation of the oxide. The chlorination of the oxide forms the oxychlorides MO3Cl, so BhO3Cl should be formed in this reaction. Fluorination results in MO3F and MO2F3 for the heavier elements in addition to the rhenium compounds ReOF5 and ReF7. Therefore, oxyfluoride formation for bohrium may help to indicate eka-rhenium properties.
Gemigliptin (rINN), sold under the brand name Zemiglo, is an oral anti-hyperglycemic agent (anti-diabetic drug) of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4 inhibitor) class of drugs. Glucose lowering effects of DPP-4 inhibitors are mainly mediated by GLP-1 and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) incretin hormones which are inactivated by DPP-4. Gemigliptin was initially developed solely by LG Life Sciences. In 2010, Double-Crane Pharmaceutical Co. (DCPC) joined with LGLS to co-develop the final compound and collaborate on the marketing of the drug in China. LGLS also announced in November 2010 that NOBEL Ilac has been granted rights to develop and commercialize gemigliptin in Turkey. A new drug application (NDA) for gemigliptin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes was submitted to the Korea Food & Drug Administration (KFDA) in July 2011. In June 2012, the KFDA approved the manufacture and distribution of LG Life Sciences’ diabetes treatment, Zemiglo, the main substance of which is gemigliptin. LG Life Sciences signed a licensing agreement with multinational pharmaceutical companies such as Sanofi (Paris, France) and Stendhal (Mexico City, Mexico) for 104 countries. Currently, gemigliptin has been approved in eleven countries such as India, Columbia, Costa Rica, Panama, and Ecuador, and several clinical studies are in progress in Russia, Mexico, and Thailand.
Substituted phenethylamines are a chemical class of organic compounds based upon the phenethylamine structure; the class is composed of all the derivative compounds of phenethylamine which can be formed by replacing, or substituting, one or more hydrogen atoms in the phenethylamine core structure with substituents. Many substituted phenethylamines are psychoactive drugs, which belong to a variety of different drug classes, including central nervous system stimulants (e.g., amphetamine), hallucinogens (e.g., 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine), entactogens (e.g., 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine), appetite suppressants (e.g. phentermine), nasal decongestants and bronchodilators (e.g., pseudoephedrine), antidepressants (e.g. bupropion), antiparkinson agents (e.g., selegiline), and vasopressors (e.g., ephedrine), among others. Many of these psychoactive compounds exert their pharmacological effects primarily by modulating monoamine neurotransmitter systems; however, there is no mechanism of action or biological target that is common to all members of this subclass. Numerous endogenous compounds—including hormones, monoamine neurotransmitters, and many trace amines (e.g., dopamine, norepinephrine, adrenaline, tyramine, and others)—are substituted phenethylamines. Dopamine is simply phenethylamine with a hydroxyl group attached to the 3 and 4 position of the benzene ring. Several notable recreational drugs, such as MDMA (ecstasy), methamphetamine, and cathinones, are also members of the class. All of the substituted amphetamines are phenethylamines, as well.
=== Photosynthetic prokaryotic lineages === Early photosynthetic systems, such as those in green and purple sulfur and green and purple nonsulfur bacteria, are thought to have been anoxygenic, and used various other molecules than water as electron donors. Green and purple sulfur bacteria are thought to have used hydrogen and sulfur as electron donors. Green nonsulfur bacteria used various amino and other organic acids as electron donors. Purple nonsulfur bacteria used a variety of nonspecific organic molecules. The use of these molecules is consistent with the geological evidence that Earth's early atmosphere was highly reducing at that time. With a possible exception of Heimdallarchaeota, photosynthesis is not found in archaea. Haloarchaea are photoheterotrophic; they can absorb energy from the sun, but do not harvest carbon from the atmosphere and are therefore not photosynthetic. Instead of chlorophyll they use rhodopsins, which convert light-energy to ion gradients but cannot mediate electron transfer reactions. In bacteria eight photosynthetic lineages are currently known:
Essendon defeated Collingwood by 82 points in the first semi-final, and North Melbourne by 17 points in the preliminary final. In the grand final against Carlton, Essendon won by 73 points, 18.17 (125) to 6.16 (52). Best players for Essendon included Norm McDonald, Bob McLure, Bill Hutchinson and Ron McEwin. John Coleman kicked six goals. In 1950, Essendon defeated the North Melbourne Football Club in both the Second Semi-Final and the Grand Final to secure consecutive VFL premierships. Best afield in the 1950 Grand Final, his final match as a player, was captain-coach Dick Reynolds, alongside Norm McDonald, Wally May, Les Gardiner, and Bob McLure. With Reynolds, aka 'King Richard', still holding court as coach in 1951, albeit now in a non-playing capacity, Essendon seemed on course for a third consecutive flag, but a controversial four-week suspension dished out to John Coleman on the eve of the finals effectively destroyed their chances. Coleman was reported for retaliation after twice being struck by his direct Carlton opponent, Harry Caspar, and without him the Dons were rated a four-goals-poorer team. Nevertheless, they still managed to battle their way to a sixth successive grand final with wins over Footscray by eight points in the first semi-final and Collingwood by two points in the preliminary final. The Dons sustained numerous injuries in the preliminary final, and the selectors sprang a surprise on Grand Final day by naming the officially retired Dick Reynolds as 20th man.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
System suitability is a set of checks performed before and during an HPLC run to confirm that the instrument and method are working as expected. It may include retention time repeatability, resolution between peaks, peak symmetry, and signal intensity. Failing suitability criteria usually invalidates the run.
An HPLC method is typically validated before its routine use and revalidated in part when significant changes affect the method. Regulators do not set a universal calendar interval. The need for revalidation depends on the change, its risk, and the applicable guidance.
Validation establishes that a method is suitable for its intended purpose, often through a planned study. Verification confirms that a laboratory can reproduce a previously validated or compendial method under its own conditions. Verification is usually narrower than full validation.
HPLC separates and quantifies compounds in a liquid sample. Detectors produce a response proportional to the amount of a compound passing through the flow cell. Identification by retention time requires comparison with a known standard.